Behavioral intrusion detection without a rule database and without a training phase. Two independent detectors fire on departures from a calibrated benign baseline. Engineered as an on-prem probe — runs on a Pi-class CPU at ~1.5 ms per trace.
Healthy traffic has a shape. Attacks don't. Laminar's behavioral baseline captures that shape on calibration, then flags every departure — without a signature, without a model, without a GPU.
No 30-day deployment observation. No rule database. No labeled attack corpus. Just a probe, a benign window, and a detector that keeps working when the threat landscape changes.
A 2025 paper from USC and Duke benchmarked four representative ML detectors — MLP, 1D-CNN, OCSVM, and LOF — on CICIDS2017 across two scenarios: (1) known attacks the model trained on, and (2) unknown attacks withheld at training time. The unknown-attack scenario is the one that matters in production. The supervised GPU-class detectors collapse.
Laminar calibrates on benign traffic only — no attack samples are ever seen during training. By definition, every attack Laminar detects is an "unknown" attack. So the fair comparison is the right column.
† Laminar's "Known" and "Unknown" F1 are the same value — because Laminar never trains on attack samples. The ≈ 0.929 figure is the macro-average across the five attack classes published on this page (BruteForce 0.969, DDoS 0.949, PortScan 0.932, DoS 0.910, Web 0.885). MLP / CNN / OCSVM / LOF figures sourced verbatim from Xu & Liu (2025).
Sources: ML figures — Xu, Z. & Liu, Y. (2025). Robust Anomaly Detection in Network Traffic: Evaluating Machine Learning Models on CICIDS2017. arXiv:2506.19877v2. · Snort figures — Saropourian, B. (2022). Evaluation of a Graphical Attack Fingerprint Model and Comparison against the Snort IDS, M.Eng. thesis, University of Victoria.
Laminar is engineered to run on a Raspberry Pi-class CPU as an on-premises detection probe. Drop one on a network segment, calibrate once, alert forever.